If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were properly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual size of service just about violates the whole service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention on the law nor with the equity. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made obvious that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-field duties while in the interim period. Read more

Unfortunately, that wasn't real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to obtaining sexually molested the pair’s son several times.

Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decreased courts.

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it's generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't persuade the department of his/her innocence.

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents from the boy or girl will not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they could do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.

Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) each plus the same shall be retained while in the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.

ten. Based over the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition isn't thought of maintainable and is also therefore liable to become dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

eight. For that reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend within the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a nicely-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted here on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.